Thursday, September 26, 2013

50 Shades of Green, a Social Experiment, and My Dwindling Sanity

I'd like to write about something that not a lot of people will know about. A conspiracy, if you will. In the grand scheme of things it's not terribly important, but I think it's a doozy little trick.

Doozy. I don't even know what doozy means, but I felt like saying it.

There's this online reviewer of film, TV, books and other media, I've been following her since she first emerged back in 2008, and could be considered a rather large fan. She's highly- intelligent, humourous, witty, analytical and insightful and I may or may not want to find her, marry her, and bear her children.

Maybe.

 photo untitled_zps89bf1c22.png

Anyway, her name is Lindsay Ellis, otherwise known as The Nostalgia Chick. Back in February she decided to embark on a project of some interest to me - she decided to write a book that parodied one of our most recent, prolific, and downright annoying literary phenomenons - that of teenage Paranormal Romance. You know the one, Mary Sue meets boy, boy turns out to be a vampire/werewolf/mummy/tapeworm, they flounder about bouncing off some cardboard extras designed purely to provide some mild conflict and opposition for a bit and then finally settle down. I've written and talked about this literary plague at length before.

Lindsay intended to write a book that both explored, and - not to put too fine a point on it - ripped the absolute rat shit bat shit piss out of the Twilight generation. All while pretending to be a real book. She titled her brainchild '50 Shades of Green' and you can see the webseries chronicling the project here -

http://blip.tv/50shadesofgreen

 photo g2_zps135698f6.jpg

TL:DW, she sits around with her friend drinking wine and discussing the building blocks of the novel for 15 mins each time, releasing the video to the public and taking and taking input in the form of comments and suggestions (mai hero). Each video covers something like 'what will the Mary Sue be like?' 'What creature will the boy be?' 'What's the storyline?' and then then moves on to 'We need cover art, please send us some' and finally 'whoo here is the launch party for our book'. I've been watching each video as they are released each month with great interest, wanting to know the direction that this parody was going to take.

After many suggestions from the fans and some deliberation, Nostalgia Chick finally settled on Cthulhu as the love interest. I think it had something to do with mocking the Twilight generation further, most of whom will assume that HP Lovecraft is some kind of vibrator and that The Necronomicon is a book that tells you how to turn people into toads. An ancient monstrous infamously untameable force of the universe indifferent to the fate of humans, created a hundred years ago by one of the most intelligent writers of our time, falling in love with an ordinary teenage girl? Of course! The Twilight generation would lap this shit up and then ask for seconds.


For the three people out there in the world who don't know what Cthulhu looks like, here is a picture.

 photo IMAG0307_zps570a07ec.jpg


Mmm, tentacles.

So with the characters and plot finally cemented, the book was written. It was a story about a Bella Sue who has a fling with an ancient tentacled god. The blurb?

'In his house at R’lyeh, great Cthulhu lies dreaming... of her.  
What would you do if you discovered you were the only one in the world with the hidden power to keep it from utter annihilation?  
What if you had no idea what that power might even be?  
Andromeda Slate, the self-proclaimed most ordinary girl in America, can’t figure out why the gorgeous but mysterious new boy at high school seems to hate her so much. It couldn't have anything to do with the strange dream she had the night before he first showed up in class, could it? The dream where the very same boy rescued her from a giant, green, tentacled sea monster?  
And it couldn’t have anything to do with that time she read aloud from that ancient tome of eldritch magic, the Necronomicon... could it?  
Andi Slate never imagined she’d find herself in a situation where somehow she was the key to saving the world.  
Her life is about to get a whole lot less ordinary.'


Har. Awesome.

It was sent off to many publishers, and declined many times. Finally, a publisher accepted it. The joke was bound, and printed under a pseudonym. And on 19th August, just 6 months after the idea was created, it was released. And..it shot right to number 2 in the YA fiction charts on Amazon.com.

http://www.amazon.com/Awoken-Serra-Elinsen/dp/1491268727

Da naaaa.

 photo chart_zpsb10f908c.png


I shit you not. The book designed to mock, degrade, and generally illustrate the vapid sheep mentality of the dumbass people who love cheap paranormal romance went straight up there with the bestsellers. The bait had been dropped and the fish snapped it right up within a matter of days. And the reviews are mainly positive. I couldn't believe it. Mission accomplished.


 photo 1277342_10201271695586719_607070721_o_zps791ba568.jpg

 photo tumblr_mj5z65Sy591rqv8x1o1_1280_zpsad1e1e94.jpg

Proverbial lol.

But the strangeness of this whole project was only just beginning.

I've read it. It's pretty good. The main character Andromeda is as vacuous and bland and relatable as they always are in paranormal romance, and the book is of course very self aware, with amusing little meta moments such as the lead not understanding the point of the book she's reading (in this case The Phantom of the Opera). It starts and end as they always do and it parodies the source material very well. Even made me laugh out loud a few times.

The project was complete. The parody is out there in paper form circulating the world and fooling everyone and rather making a face that looks like this.

 photo troll-face-meme_zps09e3026c.png

Here comes the weird part. An awful lot of effort has gone into this pseudonym. Lindsay has done a magnificent job of designing a fictitious author whose name sits on the front of her book - Serra Elinsen. A little too magnificent, in fact. She has a biography (she's a 'part time author and full time mom of five rambunctious kids and loves chocolate'). She has a picture.

 photo serramain-e1374109762985_zpse3b0ed9d.jpg

She not only has her own website, but she also has a twitter, a facebook page, a goodreads page, a tvtropes entry, and many more. You can find them in the following links.

http://serraelinsen.com/ (notice that her website has an animation of a worm on a hook with fish swimming past it. Bait, fish, lolgeddit?)

https://www.facebook.com/SerraElinsen?fref=ts

http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/7190778.Serra_Elinsen 

https://twitter.com/SerraElinsen 

Serra Elinsen is prolific and replies to her fans and comments on her success. Her website details her process of writing her book. Her goodreads page contains comments saying what she thinks of other books, with a few obvious jokes about her true identity. She's the subject of more blog entries than I can count. Youtube reviews of her book have just begun. People are discussing and reviewing and praising and sharing this novel. This novel. That is intended to troll and mock the mentality of the kind of people who like this garbage is now being circulated as a must read. In fact if you google Serra Elinsen you'll get something like this -

 photo final2_zpse3712891.png

Not bad for a woman who doesn't exist. You'll notice that out of the first 50 hits, only ONE of the links is a reference to the joke. Lindsay has done such a marvellous job of creating this false persona that not even google will tell you any different.

Now here's the point that I've been building towards and the thing that's making me lose my sanity an eensy bit. I'm starting to think that Serra is a real person. I can't tell what's true and what's not. Regarding this novel and social experiment, I mean.

While looking at reviews and publicity for this book and the comments on Serra's website, I'm completely unable to tell who is in on the joke and who is not. I find the odd reviewer or commenter who knows who is behind this book and says as much, but 95% of the reviews I have seen have comprised of people worshipping this fictitious author and praising her on a job well done. And I'm wondering..do these people actually know what's going on, and are they merely playing along with the magnitude of the joke and the deception and just pretending to be a vapid fan who's been fooled? Because that would be cool. Or..are they in fact a genuine vapid fan who has been duped, lapping up the shit like we knew they would? There is no visible difference between the words of a reader who is playing along with the joke, and one who is not.

I just can't tell the difference! There is no difference between a review of the book written by someone who is playing along, and someone who's been duped. Hell, even Nostalgia Chick has admitted that she can't tell the difference.

People who are probly in on it -

 photo 5_zps68ad5e51.png
 photo 1_zpsf8280fef.png

 photo 4_zpsff7e2645.png



People who are probly not -

 photo 9_zps49884016.png

 photo 3_zps8bb51797.png

 photo 11_zps9ad7b2d1.png

Maaaybe?

 photo 8_zps384646d4.png



Pahaha.

 photo 10_zps8bc4be38.png


People who are pissed off.

 photo 14_zpsf5e5b89d.png

 photo 2_zps8e10e481.png



Wait. Wat?

 photo 12_zps60bd4b9e.png
O.O

And just to compound my confusion even further, the predictable but fortunately small amount of backlash aimed towards this 'author' has resulted in some very strange things. Have a look at this -

 photo awokenfb1_zps0ad7d78f.png

...

My brain. It hurts.

So many people think that this person is real. People are not only praising her, but they're also addressing her like they would a personal friend and even jumping in to defend her honour against any criticism she recieves. So this brings me to my next point.

[philosophy] When enough people think that something or someone is real, do they then become real? Wasn't it Einstein who said 'Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one'? Isn't it also true that most of what we percieve to be real and important is intangible and exists in the mind only? Am I in on the joke or am I part of the joke? What if -

 photo 20100108063328Exploding-head_zpsf67ad483.gif

[/philosophy]

I've been following this 50 Shades of Green project ever since it began last February. I've seen the entire thing being fabricated from vague idea all the way to YA bestseller and talked about book. I know that Serra isn't real and that this was all done in the name of parody. But all between the fan reaction, the websites, and the fact that the novel has absolutely nothing on it - both on the physical paper and nearly nothing on google too - to link it to the Nostalgia Chick, I'm starting to think I've lost it and that the 50 Shades Project was all in my mind. And that Serra is in fact real and it out there, running around with her five rambunctious kids and eating chocolate.

This experiment has messed with the minds of so many readers, and I don't even know who knows it and who doesn't. It's messing with my mind as a result.

Serra, if you're out there, I want to poke you in the nose. Just to see whether I can or not.

Oh god, please let me poke you in the nose.

2 Comments:

Blogger Josephine Stone said...

I know this is an old post (I just found out about this book this week, and was looking into reading it), but I read your post on it and wanted to point out that a publisher did not pick up this book.

It was self published through Createspace. Anyone can publish anything they want through them.

It's been a year, but I haven't run into anyone that liked it without calling it a parody or "so bad it's good", which hints at them treating it like a parody even if they thought it was meant to be serious.

But with the comments you've shown above; yeah, it's hard to tell who is real or who knows. Like, I'd be tempted to say anyone who said they'd met her would have to be in on it, right? Just to make it more real?

I don't know . . . or they just are trying to build fake relationships with authors to help their own writing careers.

6:21 am  
Blogger The Raevyn said...

Oops! My mistake. I assumed it was a publisher because in one of the videos Lindsay showed us some rejection letters she received, so I assumed that she'd gone the route of sending it to multiple publishers until one accepted. Thanks for pointing it out!

Heh yeah. The headspolode gif I provided pretty much sums up my feelings about the reality of the situation. No matter what's real and what's not though, I still admire the whole trick!

6:43 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home